AMLO welcomes Canada's condemnation of Ecuador after embassy storming – El Sol de Mexico

Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador, Mexico's president, celebrated Friday that Canada had reconsidered its position and condemned the unrest From the Ecuadorian police Mexican origin From Quito, Ecuador, to arrest that country's former vice president, Jorge Glass, who had an arrest warrant.

“It is good that the Government of Canada has modified its position! Because, like the Government of the United States, there was nothing more than that Canada's first statement was worse than the United States' statement, because Canada's first statement spoke of a possibility, it had the word 'phenomenon', when They entered the embassy, ​​and when they raided the embassy, ​​they committed a clear violation of international law. “But it is good that they (corrected) already,” the president said, recalling that both partner countries of Mexico had maintained an ambiguous position to condemn the violation of the sovereignty of the Mexican embassy.

Yesterday, Thursday, The Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs indicated that it stated that it was requesting “a detailed review of the videos of the unauthorized entry of the Ecuadorian authorities into the Mexican Embassy.” in Quito on April 5,” and condemned the entry of Ecuadorian security forces into the Mexican Embassy in Quito.

In addition, Mexico and Canada were asked to dialogue to resolve the dispute.

On Friday morning, López Obrador indicated that he had sent the United States videos of the Ecuadorian police entering the Mexican embassy also to condemn the incident: “After we sent part of the videos that we assume were there” and they did not see President (Joe) Biden, and when they saw What happened at the White House, Mr. (Jack) Sullivan, the security advisor, came out with a position of condemnation that was completely different from the first statement, which was very vague. said the Tabasco native.

See also  The United States and Mexico already have a strong competition to host the 2027 Women's World Cup

The Mexican President stressed that “in the case of Canada, the same thing, yesterday, there is a more active statement, attached to what happened.”

He confirmed in his press conference that his government He will wait until the International Court of Justice in The Hague rules on Mexico's lawsuit regarding the attack on the Mexican embassy in Quito.

“So what's next? We have to wait for the International Court of Justice to decide on our claim,” he added.

In addition, He acknowledged the position of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, Regarding the fact that it is the Member States within the body he chairs that determine whether or not Ecuador should be expelled from the United Nations, as Mexico has demanded.

He added: “And Mr. (Antonio) Guterres, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, is right when he says that resolving this matter is also up to the member states of the United Nations. So we went to the court of justice, We demand that Ecuador be suspended from the United Nations, as long as it does not speak out and admit that it has violated international law on our sovereignty.. “This is what we want.”

➡️Join the El Sol de México channel on WhatsApp so as not to miss the most important information

According to the Compensation for damages resulting from the illegal entry of the accused police into the Mexican Embassy, The president said that the International Court of Justice in The Hague “if it considers the matter just and relevant, will ask Ecuador to suspend its rights as a member state, as long as it does not speak out and offer a solution.” “Apology and commitment not to repeat, but what we also want is for the UN decision to expel any member state that violates international law and violates the sovereignty of states and their embassies to become a doctrine,” the man from Tabasco said. .

See also  This is how remote work was imposed in the United Kingdom despite resistance from the “establishment.”

He stressed that if this were to be repeated in any part of the world, if the International Court of Justice saw it, the matter would be submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, and I would put it to the attention of all countries, for them to vote, “If it is decided to expel a state that violates international rights, it cannot The United Nations Security Council exercises veto power, and none of the five countries with veto power can do so.” “He finished…

Sacha Woodward

"Wannabe writer. Lifelong problem solver. Gamer. Incurable web guru. Professional music lover."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top